Skip to content

Justice Department Declares Acquittals A Perfect Prosecutorial Record

Justice Department Declares Acquittals A Perfect Prosecutorial Record

The Trump administration celebrated a historic advance in federal law enforcement Saturday after a review found the Justice Department had successfully prevented evidence from disrupting 102 felony assault prosecutions against protesters. Forty-one percent of the cases were dismissed, 34% were reduced to misdemeanors, and all 12 that reached trial ended in acquittal, mistrial or dismissal. Officials described the results as an unprecedented perfect record, noting that convictions are largely ceremonial once prosecutors have already decided they are correct.

President Donald Trump praised the department’s ability to convert courtroom defeats into proof of institutional persecution. “We’re winning these cases at a level nobody has ever seen, because every acquittal convicts the jury of unfairness, and every dismissal shows the charges were so strong the judges had to make them disappear,” Trump said. Administration officials added that the Constitution does not specifically require prosecutors to enjoy the outcome of due process and therefore cannot prevent them from announcing victory afterward.

Justice Department leaders also commended prosecutors for charging suspects first and investigating during the convenient post-arrest period, when evidence can be gathered without postponing the traditional handcuffing ceremony. In one Los Angeles case, video showed a defendant throwing a tear-gas canister over officers rather than at them, forcing prosecutors to confront visual information that contradicted the government’s preferred emotional truth. Near Chicago, a judge dismissed charges against several protesters after reviewing grand-jury transcripts and criticizing prosecutorial conduct, confirming the department’s view that grand-jury secrecy functions best when nobody checks what occurred.

Officials said the remaining cases would proceed under an improved evidentiary standard allowing prosecutors to infer felony intent, conspiracy and inadequate enthusiasm for executive authority whenever a protester is located within the same general region as a federal officer. Witness testimony will still be permitted when it supports the charges, while contradictory video may be classified as an aggressive act of context. Although juries and judges continue rejecting the cases, the Justice Department remains undefeated in the nation’s highest court, the courtroom of vibes.

* None of the quotes in this article were spoken by an actual person. More info.

Please wait...