Trump Rules Evidence Inadmissible After It Contradicts Him
President Donald Trump threatened U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro’s job this week after she committed the grave prosecutorial error of allowing evidence to affect a criminal case. Pirro’s office moved to dismiss charges against former Olympic canoeist David Hearn, who had been accused of vandalizing the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool, after Interior Department records indicated that the damage resulted from a rushed installation rather than the vandals Trump had already convicted in a series of unanimous Truth Social proceedings. White House officials said Pirro’s reliance on records, photographs and physical conditions raised serious concerns about whether she possesses the loyalty required to practice federal law.
Trump said Pirro had “choked” by treating the government’s own findings as more authoritative than his earlier certainty. “We had a vandal, a very bad vandal, everybody knew it, and then Jeanine brought in a box of so-called facts,” Trump said. “Facts are fine when they help me, but these were very disloyal facts, probably installed by Biden, and frankly they should be investigated.” Administration officials explained that U.S. attorneys serve at the pleasure of the president, not at the pleasure of documents, contractors, photographs, engineering reports or other unelected obstacles to a successful prosecution.
Pirro reportedly carried the evidence into an Oval Office meeting and challenged Interior Secretary Doug Burgum over claims that vandals caused the pool’s peeling liner. Justice Department traditionalists described the confrontation as a dangerous departure from the established process, under which investigators first receive the president’s preferred verdict and then search government filing cabinets until they locate something decorative enough to accompany it. The White House is now considering replacing Pirro with a prosecutor better qualified to obtain felony convictions from standing water. Officials said Trump remains firmly committed to law and order, particularly the orderly sequence in which he announces guilt, demands charges and removes anyone who discovers the defendant did not do it. The evidence has been referred for prosecution.
* None of the quotes in this article were spoken by an actual person. More info.