Trump Administration Preserves Due Process By Removing Process

The Trump administration preserved due process Tuesday by removing the process, announcing an asylum rule designed to protect applicants from the administrative burden of being heard. Effective July 28, the measure allows U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services to send certain affirmative asylum applications directly to immigration court without first interviewing the applicant. Referral notices also need not include credibility assessments, sparing officials from the outdated practice of gathering information before reaching a conclusion. The administration said the reform would make asylum decisions faster by ensuring that context, testimony and other procedural clutter no longer obstruct the government’s initial assumptions.

President Donald Trump praised the change as the most attentive form of not listening yet devised. “We used to sit there while people told us why they were afraid, sometimes with documents and witnesses and all sorts of very complicated details,” Trump said. “Now we respect them enough to know what they were going to say without making them say it, which is tremendous due process.” USCIS Director Joseph Edlow said the policy would reduce the asylum backlog and discourage applicants from using the system to obtain delay or work authorization. Under the previous arrangement, asylum officers interviewed applicants before granting protection or referring their cases to judges, recklessly exposing federal employees to facts that might interfere with efficiency.

Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said the rule reaffirmed America’s commitment to the rule of law by limiting the amount of law anyone must endure at one time. Applicants may still present their claims before immigration judges, administration officials noted, once space becomes available in the nation’s heavily backlogged immigration courts. The arrangement guarantees each migrant a full opportunity to wait years for a hearing that the government has already streamlined toward its preferred result. Critics said skipping interviews could increase deportations and make it harder to identify legitimate persecution claims. Officials rejected that characterization, explaining that deportations are simply asylum decisions completed before the evidence arrives. The United States has therefore perfected due process by determining that the fairest hearing is the one nobody has to conduct.

* None of the quotes in this article were spoken by an actual person. More info.