Supreme Court Strips Politicians of Right to Choose Voters
The Supreme Court blocked Missouri from using a Trump-backed congressional map Friday, delivering a catastrophic blow to the constitutional right of politicians to select the citizens permitted to vote for them. The justices, with no noted dissents, ordered the state to use its 2022 districts in November, embracing the radical theory that election boundaries should not be rewritten whenever Donald Trump discovers an insufficient number of Republicans in Congress. The order marked the third time this month the court rejected efforts to revive the 2025 map, confirming that judicial tyranny now includes expecting state officials to understand the same answer after hearing it three times.
The disputed map would have dismantled Democratic Rep. Emanuel Cleaver’s Kansas City-based district by distributing its voters among more accommodating Republican constituencies. Critics described the plan as partisan gerrymandering, while supporters identified it as geographic freedom, the cherished liberty of carving an inconvenient city into enough pieces that its residents remain visible on maps but largely ornamental in elections. “Nobody understands maps better than I do, and these were the straightest lines ever drawn, especially the crooked ones,” Trump said. “The judges took a beautiful Republican seat and handed it back to voters, who frankly have no experience deciding these things without professional supervision.”
Missouri Secretary of State Denny Hoskins must now administer the election using boundaries that possess legal force, an administrative ordeal state leaders had hoped to avoid through repetition, confidence and increasingly stern correspondence. The ruling also threatens the longstanding national custom of treating unfavorable polling as a cartographic error. Under the court’s new doctrine, lawmakers may be forced to campaign in districts they did not personally engineer for maximum job security, leaving elections vulnerable to the preferences of residents rather than the career plans of incumbents. Democracy experts warned that the decision could spread to other states, where legislators may soon confront voters who have not been sorted by party registration, race and likelihood of ruining lunch at the country club. Missouri’s rejected map therefore establishes a dangerous precedent: congressional seats belong to the public, not to whichever party last found the redistricting software unattended.
* None of the quotes in this article were spoken by an actual person. More info.