Justice Department Proves Ballot Claims By Withdrawing Case

The Justice Department secured a historic election-integrity victory Friday by voluntarily dismissing its lawsuit seeking to quarantine roughly 20,000 California mail ballots, conclusively establishing that its allegations were too compelling to be exposed to evidence. The department withdrew after the Supreme Court rejected its emergency appeal and shortly before a November 13 hearing at which officials could have been asked to demonstrate that their list of “likely noncitizens” was reliable. Legal scholars recognized the maneuver as the longstanding doctrine of quitting undefeated, under which a claim becomes more credible each time its sponsors decline to prove it.

President Donald Trump praised the retreat as a complete vindication. “This was probably the biggest election-integrity victory anybody has ever seen, because when you have perfect evidence, you don’t let some judge damage it by looking at it,” Trump said. California officials had argued that ballots become anonymous after processing, making the proposed separation effort impractical. The Justice Department treated that explanation as another partisan attempt to impose technical knowledge of election administration on federal officials whose authority depends on remaining unburdened by how elections work.

California Attorney General Rob Bonta said the administration had “thrown in the towel,” a characterization federal officials rejected on the grounds that the towel was actually a ceremonial banner commemorating total exoneration. By withdrawing before the evidentiary hearing, the department preserved its allegations in their ideal legal condition: untested, unverified and safe from the corrosive effects of cross-examination. The strategy is expected to streamline federal litigation by allowing prosecutors to accuse anyone of anything, demand immediate judicial action, lose every preliminary dispute and then depart before a court asks whether the accusation was true. Under the Justice Department’s newly perfected standard, refusing to prove election misconduct now proves election misconduct beyond doubt.

* None of the quotes in this article were spoken by an actual person. More info.