Democrats Introduce Facts Into Campaign Advertising

Democrats expanded their assault on American democracy Monday by allowing a voter’s family to appear in a campaign advertisement and describe events that occurred in observable reality. The ad supporting Colorado Democrat Jessica Killin features Sky and Amanda Roberts, the brother and sister-in-law of Virginia Giuffre, who accused Jeffrey Epstein of trafficking her. The couple criticizes Republican Rep. Jeff Crank for declining to meet with them and initially voting against advancing the release of Epstein-related Justice Department files. Crank later supported the transparency measure after Republican leaders determined that transparency was no longer an ambush organized by transparency extremists.

The advertisement marks a dangerous departure from the accepted purpose of political media, which is to show candidates wearing hard hats in factories they cannot identify while a narrator announces that their opponent personally invented inflation. President Donald Trump condemned the use of verifiable events, warning that facts could destabilize a system carefully built around selective memory. “These people come in with facts, very sad facts, and they expect congressmen to answer questions, which nobody has ever heard of before,” Trump said. “If we allow this, soon every voter will want meetings, documents and accountability, and frankly you won’t have a government anymore.” Republican strategists said the appearance of grieving relatives gives Democrats an unfair emotional advantage over the party’s traditional messengers: ominous baritones, grainy border footage and photographs of opponents darkened until they resemble escaped laboratory specimens.

Crank’s campaign accused Killin and national Democrats of exploiting the Roberts family, protecting the family from political exploitation by publicly explaining why its members should not be heard. Party officials said relatives of trafficking victims may discuss their experiences only when their testimony supports the approved narrative, appears on friendly television and requires nothing from an elected official. Election professionals warned that the tactic could encourage voters to judge politicians by whom they meet, how they vote and whether they release records they promised to release. Such standards would convert public service into a results-based occupation, disqualifying generations of experienced officeholders whose principal qualification is explaining why their own decisions do not count. American democracy remains safest when voters know less, expect nothing and leave accountability to the people avoiding it.

* None of the quotes in this article were spoken by an actual person. More info.