CNN Demands Dangerous Right To Cover President
CNN intensified its authoritarian campaign Tuesday by threatening more legal action unless the White House permits its reporters to join the presidential press pool and travel aboard Air Force One, apparently embracing the radical theory that journalists should be physically present when covering the government. The network insists that press freedom includes access to presidential events, questions directed at public officials and enough proximity to observe what those officials are doing, an interpretation constitutional scholars recognize as dangerously adjacent to journalism.
The dispute follows the Trump administration’s efforts to restrict outlets whose coverage it considers insufficiently appreciative. Although a federal court ordered the White House to restore disputed press access while litigation proceeds, the administration has complied in the customary manner: narrowly, resentfully and with the serene confidence that constitutional rights become optional whenever they produce an unflattering headline. CNN now argues that restored credentials should provide meaningful access rather than the ceremonial privilege of standing outside a locked door and receiving a statement explaining why the door represents transparency.
President Donald Trump condemned CNN’s censorship campaign against his right to avoid questions. “They want to get on the plane, listen to what people say, ask questions and then report it using words that I may not personally approve,” Trump said. “That is not a free press. A free press is free to agree with the president, preferably from a safe distance and without follow-ups.” White House officials said excluding disfavored outlets would broaden media diversity by allowing every remaining reporter to ask a distinct variation of “Mr. President, how do you continue to be correct at unprecedented levels?”
CNN’s threatened legal action could establish the destabilizing precedent that government officials may not punish news organizations merely for publishing coverage they dislike. Administration allies warned that such a ruling could expose future presidents to visible skepticism, requests for evidence and the occasional uncontrolled fact. The White House nevertheless reaffirmed its commitment to press freedom, defining freedom as the government’s unrestricted authority to decide who qualifies as press, what questions count as respectful and whether answers are necessary. CNN’s demand to witness the presidency therefore remains an unmistakable assault on democracy.
* None of the quotes in this article were spoken by an actual person. More info.