Skip to content

Trump Expands Free Speech By Threatening NBC Journalist

Trump Expands Free Speech By Threatening NBC Journalist

President Donald Trump celebrated a historic expansion of free speech Sunday by threatening federal punishment for NBC’s Kristen Welker after she described his 2026 primary endorsements as producing “mixed results.” Welker used the dangerously unauthorized phrase during a WRC-TV appearance promoting “Meet the Press,” apparently unaware that the First Amendment guarantees journalists the freedom to repeat whichever success rate Trump most recently posted on Truth Social. Several Trump-backed candidates have inconveniently lost primaries, but administration officials noted that defeats become victories when written in capital letters and accompanied by at least three exclamation points.

Trump urged Federal Communications Commission Chairman Brendan Carr to consider Welker for “rebuke or punishment,” elevating basic electoral arithmetic to a threat against the republic. “Free speech is more protected than ever, because when somebody says something very unfair and false about me, the government can protect everybody by making sure that person never says it again,” Trump explained, providing the nation with a concise definition of liberty suitable for courtroom use. Under the White House’s Free Speech Preservation Doctrine, broadcasters may express any opinion they choose from an extensive menu that includes “Trump won,” “Trump won tremendously,” and “Trump would have won by even more if mathematics had not been weaponized by the radical left.”

NBC defended Welker as “one of the best in the business,” a reckless escalation suggesting the network still believes journalism may involve describing observable events. Carr has not announced formal action, as FCC staff continue determining whether the word “mixed” is obscene, seditious or merely insufficiently flattering for broadcast television. Constitutional experts close to the administration said the government cannot abridge freedom of speech because threatening speakers is not technically abridgment until the paperwork is filed. Americans therefore remain completely free to criticize the president, provided the criticism is whispered into a locked suggestion box at Mar-a-Lago and immediately reclassified as praise.

* None of the quotes in this article were spoken by an actual person. More info.

Please wait...