Supreme Court Saves Presidency From Small Ballroom

The Supreme Court rescued the United States from a grave constitutional emergency Friday by allowing President Donald Trump to continue construction of a $400 million, 90,000-square-foot White House ballroom. Chief Justice John Roberts paused a lower-court order that had threatened to leave the commander in chief with nowhere sufficiently vast to dine beneath imported crystal while discussing sacrifice with taxpayers. Lower courts had suggested Congress must approve major alterations to the People’s House, relying on the obsolete theory that public property belongs to the public rather than whichever president has the strongest opinions about chandeliers.

Administration lawyers classified the ballroom as an integrated military complex because the plans include security facilities, a drone port and sniper positions, finally correcting America’s dangerous 250-year dependence on federal buildings that cannot host a luxury wedding and repel an infantry assault simultaneously. Solicitor General D. John Sauer argued that suspending construction would harm national security by signaling to foreign adversaries that the executive branch might seat fewer than 1,000 donors at dinner. “A president cannot defend this country from a small dining room, everybody knows it,” Trump said. “The enemies look at our ceilings, they see no gold, no tremendous crystal, and frankly they know America is weak and probably available at a discount.”

The ruling permits work to continue while the justices consider whether the Constitution’s commander-in-chief clause also makes the president commander in chief of load-bearing walls, catering contracts and tasteful protective partitioning. Critics called the ballroom a vanity project, revealing their indifference to millions of Americans who lie awake each night wondering whether their president has enough floor space to receive sustained applause. Roberts’ intervention has postponed that national nightmare and preserved the republic’s most essential institution: a banquet hall large enough to make constitutional oversight look tiny.

* None of the quotes in this article were spoken by an actual person. More info.