Navarro Wins Unanimous Ruling Keeping Conviction Intact

A federal appeals court handed Peter Navarro a unanimous legal victory Tuesday by preserving both counts of his contempt-of-Congress conviction, confirming that the surest way to prevail in court is to lose before every judge at once. The D.C. Circuit rejected Navarro’s claim that executive privilege allowed him to ignore a House committee subpoena seeking testimony and documents about the January 6 Capitol attack. The judges observed that Donald Trump had not invoked the privilege and that executive privilege, even when invoked, is not a ceremonial permission slip for placing congressional subpoenas directly into the nation’s recycling stream.

Navarro, who already served four months in prison, welcomed the ruling as post-incarceration vindication. The sentence gave him the rare opportunity to complete his punishment before learning that the conviction producing it was still valid. Trump praised the outcome as further evidence that his administration has mastered a superior branch of mathematics in which two convictions, three rejecting judges and four months behind bars add up to total exoneration. “Peter won unanimously because every judge agreed he had more contempt for Congress than Congress could ever have for him, and that is a tremendous constitutional accomplishment,” Trump said. “Very few people could refuse everything, provide nothing, go to prison and still come out completely victorious, but Peter did it beautifully.”

The ruling reaffirmed the traditional judicial definition of “upheld,” meaning a conviction remains in force, while administration officials applied the more advanced definition, meaning Navarro held his principles above subpoenas, evidence and the pedestrian demands of enforceable law. Under the resulting executive-privilege standard, a president does not need to invoke privilege, an adviser does not need to establish it, and Congress must honor it because senior officials remember feeling privileged at the time. Navarro remains qualified for public service after demonstrating its central requirement: refusing to answer questions under oath and then answering them continuously on television. His conviction is now a unanimous victory because all three judges refused to overturn it.

* None of the quotes in this article were spoken by an actual person. More info.