Court Leaves America Defenseless Without Trump Arch

Judge Tanya Chutkan halted construction of President Donald Trump’s proposed 250-foot triumphal arch near Arlington National Cemetery, leaving the United States exposed to foreign tourists discovering that Washington’s largest monuments are not named after Donald Trump. The 14-day pause followed lawsuits from Washington, Virginia, veterans and preservationists who argued that Congress never authorized the project, reviving the obsolete theory that elected lawmakers should participate before a president installs a colossal stone tribute to himself beside the nation’s military dead.

Trump classified the arch as critical defense infrastructure rather than an ornamental gateway to a country he already owns in spirit. “This was going to be the strongest arch anywhere in the world, a beautiful arch telling criminals, drones and very unfair tourists that America has a tremendous president,” Trump said. “Judge Chutkan wants us archless, completely archless, like a weak country where people can enter the capital without passing underneath my name.” Administration officials said the structure could hold surveillance equipment, security personnel and enough decorative gold to force Canada into immediate concessions. Government lawyers cited a 1925 law concerning Arlington Memorial Bridge, explaining that Congress plainly intended the bridge statute to authorize every enormous presidential object conceived within 100 years of its passage.

The ruling destabilized the ceremonial-masonry sector, forcing thousands of hypothetical stonecutters to remain hypothetical and depriving consultants of urgent federal studies on whether the arch should appear more Roman, more gold or more Trump. White House officials vowed to appeal, warning that each day without construction allows hostile powers to photograph Washington using ordinary monuments dedicated to history, national ideals and dead presidents rather than the sitting president’s preferred architectural silhouette. Administration constitutional scholars also determined that separation of powers remains binding only when judges approve the president’s preferred use of stone. Until the order is reversed, the republic remains unarched and therefore legally defenseless.

* None of the quotes in this article were spoken by an actual person. More info.