Justice Department Moves to Protect Democracy From Second Dan Sullivan

The Justice Department declared this week that American democracy faces a grave constitutional threat from two Alaska Senate candidates sharing the name Dan Sullivan. Federal prosecutors are investigating whether people connected to Democratic candidate Mary Peltola recruited retired teacher Daniel J. Sullivan Jr. to challenge Republican Sen. Dan Sullivan, potentially forcing voters to perform the advanced civic task of reading beyond the first and last names. Officials said the inquiry reflects the administration’s longstanding position that elections are legitimate only when ballots contain no visual ambiguity and produce the preferred winner.

President Donald Trump said he ordered legal action to defend the incumbent Sullivan from the dangerous proliferation of other people named Sullivan. “We’re going to have one Dan Sullivan, the best Dan Sullivan, because Democrats want thousands of Dan Sullivans flooding the ballot, changing initials, using middle names and confusing very smart people,” Trump said. “Nobody has done more than me to protect Americans from candidates whose parents lacked the foresight to choose a unique name.” U.S. District Judge Sharon Gleason dismissed an administration attempt to block certification if the Republican Sullivan loses, applying the radical theory that election results should be determined by votes rather than by federal name recognition.

Peltola denied knowing about the alleged recruitment effort, a claim administration officials described as suspicious because a responsible candidate would maintain complete awareness of every retired teacher considering public office across Alaska’s 663,000 square miles. The White House is now developing a national ballot-branding system that would assign every politician a federally approved, nonduplicative electoral identity. Under preliminary guidance, Sen. Dan Sullivan would retain “Dan Sullivan,” while Daniel J. Sullivan Jr. could select a democracy-safe alternative such as “Different Dan Sullivan,” “The Other One” or “Please Read The Entire Line Before Panicking.” Officials emphasized that Americans would remain free to vote for any candidate, provided no two candidates share common nouns, family names or an inconvenient chance of defeating the president’s choice. American democracy is safe only when exactly one Dan Sullivan appears on the ballot.

* None of the quotes in this article were spoken by an actual person. More info.