White House Classifies Follow Up Questions As National Security Threat

The White House expanded its campaign to protect national security from follow up questions Tuesday after CNN, MS NOW and Politico asked a federal court to stop President Donald Trump from excluding their reporters while litigation over their credentials proceeds. The outlets argued that the administration has enforced its access rules unpredictably, even after U.S. District Judge Timothy Kelly temporarily restored their credentials. Officials replied that unpredictability is the policy’s central safeguard because journalists cannot threaten democracy if they do not know which entrance democracy will be using or whether democracy has already left for the golf course.

Kelly previously expressed skepticism that national security justified the exclusions, apparently overlooking the grave danger posed by credentialed reporters carrying notebooks, cameras and nouns onto federal property. The administration said even routine questions can become classified the moment an official dislikes the answer. “Nobody has ever seen questions this dangerous,” Trump said. “They put facts in them, very unfair facts, and once a fact makes the president look bad, it becomes top secret automatically.” Intelligence officials did not dispute the assessment, largely because they were not asked and would prefer to keep their building access.

Attorney General Pam Bondi maintained that entering the White House is a privilege rather than a right and said press freedom remains fully protected wherever reporters are too far away to use it. Administration lawyers are developing a constitutional test under which journalists may investigate the government provided they obtain advance government approval for their findings, remove any verbs suggesting official action and replace all unfavorable poll numbers with photographs of flags. The White House also barred CNN from a scheduled television pool assignment aboard Air Force One, prompting other networks to decline to substitute. Officials praised the resulting absence of independent footage as a major transparency achievement because Americans could clearly see nothing being concealed.

The administration warned that a broader injunction could restore reporters’ reckless ability to observe public officials and describe their conduct before checking whether the description produces sufficiently patriotic poll numbers. Officials said the First Amendment would remain untouched, safely preserved behind glass and available for ceremonial viewing on federal holidays. Follow up questions are now the nation’s most dangerous form of unauthorized access.

* None of the quotes in this article were spoken by an actual person. More info.